Apply to be a Chitika Publisher!
Featured Post Today
print this page
Latest Post
Showing posts with label ANSWERING-ISLAM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ANSWERING-ISLAM. Show all posts

ISLAM'S MYTH: EVERYTHING WERE MADE IN PAIRS

CREATION IN PAIRS:

excerpted from this site 

The Arabic word “azvaj” is the plural of “zavj” meaning “pairs,” “matches,” “partners.” There are three sorts of pairs in the Creation as described in the verse:
a- Pairs that grow from the earth, i.e., plants that have species of differentiated sex. 
b- Human pairs, males and females. Also some included human characteristics like bravery / cowardice; love / hate; generosity / stinginess, etc. 
c- Pairs unknown: men did not know anything about the creation in pairs at the time of the descent of the Quran. In this section we shall be dealing with the latter in particular.
Glory be to the One, who created in pairs all things that the earth produces, as well as themselves, and other things they do not know. [36: 36]
THIS QURANIC PIECE SEEMS TRUE AT FIRST SIGHT AS IT WAS PROVEN ACCORDING AS THEY SAY IT.

THE DISCOVERY THAT WON THE NOBEL PRIZE AWARD
The atom lies at the basis of all matter in the universe. A study of this smallest piece of matter may give an idea about the creation of everything in pairs (partners). As research conducted on the structure of the atom gained momentum, it became clear that the ]\constituents of elementary particles were not limited to protons, neutrons and electrons and that their compositions were of a more complex nature and an unerring precision. Creation in pairs is also valid for elementary particles.
A proton has its anti-proton, an electron is coupled with a positron, and a neutron possesses an anti-neutron. The creation of matter in pairs is one of the discoveries of towering importance of physics. Paul Dirac, a British scientist, was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1933 for his discovery in this field. His discovery (Parity) led to the discovery of the fact that matter has an anti-matter. God’s ingenious calculation is also seen in the numbers of protons, electrons, and neutrons, and of their respective pairs. Let us take as an example the electron and its counterpart, the positron. When these two get together, energy is generated. If there were 15 units of positron versus 10 units of electrons, 10 units of electrons and 10 units of positrons would be eliminated leaving behind 5 units of positron. If their numbers were equal, there would emerge only energy, leaving behind no electrons or positrons. The survival of protons, electrons and neutrons depends on the quantities higher than their respective pairs, while the numerical balance between electrons, protons and neutrons is also important. For example, if the number of electrons were less than the number of protons, there would be no life in the universe. All the fine calculations in our existence are based on this fact. Had one single formation of thousands of phenomena been left to chance, we would not have been on our planet today. We exist thanks to the omniscience of our Creator Who controls everything through His omnipotence.

INDEED, IT WAS ACCEPTED BY MOST AS IT WAS APPARENTLY CORROBORATED BY STUDIES.
The importance of creation in pairs in the universe gained momentum with the discovery of quarks within the protons and neutrons as well. Laboratory research has made it clear that quarks and leptons (another subatomic particle) emerged in pairs. When the quark called “Bottom” was discovered after such quarks as “Up,” “Down,” “Charm” and “Strange,” the consciousness of creation in pairs was so widespread among scientists that the name “Top” was given to a quark before even it was discovered. In the year 1994, the discovery of the quark “Top” was announced. The research carried out in the Fermi labs in the USA resulted in the discovery of “Top,” that paired up with the quark called “Bottom.”
All paired creations contribute to the integral order of the universe. The quarks “Up” and “Down,” the protons and antiprotons, the positive and negative electricity charges in the universe have no consciousness. All these well-ordered and predetermined formations are created in a microcosm that, in turn, renders possible the formation of galaxies, stars, planets, plants, the animal kingdom and humankind. Opposite pairs of forces and opposite pairs of particles owe their existence to an Omnipotent Power. The colorful and marvelous universe based on the formation of opposite pairs of force bars the possibility of chaos. Whoever the author of the creation and the designer of ultimate ends may have been, it was He who generated the pairs of particles and forces and set these opposite particles and forces to operate in a harmonious unity until the targets are reached. For those who take heed the evidence is clear.
And We created pairs of everything that you may contemplate. [51: 49]
THE THING THOUGH IS TRUTH MUST BE CONSISTENT IN ALL ASPECT AS REVEALED, DETRIMENTALLY IS THE BLATANT FACT THAT ONE-CELLED ORGANISMS EXIST AS TESTIMONY AGAINST ALLAH'S VERACITY.
SITE 
In contrast to the linear chromosomes found in eukaryotic cells, the strains of bacteria initially studied were found to have single, covalently closed, circular chromosomes.1 The circularity of the bacterial chromosome was elegantly demonstrated by electron microscopy in both Gram negative bacteria (such as Escherichia coli) and Gram positive bacteria (such as Bacillus subtilis). Bacterial plasmids were also shown to be circular. In fact, the experiments were so beautiful and the evidence was so convincing that the idea that bacterial chromosomes are circular and eukaryotic chromosomes are linear was quickly accepted as a definitive distinction between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. However, like most other distinctions between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells2, it is now clear that this dichotomy is incorrect. Not all bacteria have a single circular chromosome: some bacteria have multiple circular chromosomes, and many bacteria have linear chromosomes and linear plasmids. 
And We created pairs of everything that you may contemplate. [51: 49]
THIS IS FALSIFIED BY SCIENCE AS PROVEN ABOVE INFORMING ABOUT ONE-CELLED ORGANISMS. EXAMPLE OF THOSE:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_(biology)#Anatomy 
There are two types of cells: eukaryotic and prokaryotic. Prokaryotic cells are usually independent, while eukaryotic cells can either exist as a single celled organism or be found in multicellular organisms.
ONE SINGLE-CELLED ORGANISMS AS HAVING  ONE PROKARYOTIC CELL ARE LISTED IN THE DIAGRAM BELOW!
DIAGRAM OF EUKARYOTES, ONE-CELLED ORGANISMS THAT HAS NO PAIR IS ON THE RIGHT!
Table 1: Comparison of features of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells
ProkaryotesEukaryotes
Typical organismsbacteria, archaeaprotists, fungi, plants, animals
Typical size~ 1–5 µm[6]~ 10–100 µm[6] (sperm cells, apart from the tail, are smaller)
Type of nucleusnucleoid region; no real nucleusreal nucleus with double membrane
DNAcircular (usually)linear molecules (chromosomes) with histone proteins
RNA-/protein-synthesiscoupled in cytoplasmRNA-synthesis inside the nucleus
protein synthesis in cytoplasm
Ribosomes50S+30S60S+40S
Cytoplasmatic structurevery few structureshighly structured by endomembranes and a cytoskeleton
Cell movementflagella made of flagellinflagella and cilia containing microtubules; lamellipodia and filopodia containing actin
Mitochondrianoneone to several thousand (though some lack mitochondria)
Chloroplastsnonein algae and plants
Organizationusually single cellssingle cells, colonies, higher multicellular organisms with specialized cells
Cell divisionBinary fission (simple division)Mitosis (fission or budding)
Meiosis

AS THE DIAGRAM SHOWS, ONE-CELLED ORGANISMS SUCH AS ARCHAEA HAS NO PAIR. IT IS A SINGLE-CELLED BACTERIA THAT REPRODUCE BY BINARY FISSION (simple division).

ar·chae·a [aar k ə, rkee ə]plural noun
primitive single-celled organisms: members of one of two distinct groups of the most primitive living single-celled organisms, similar in size to bacteria but different in molecular organization
Microsoft® Encarta® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
THAT SCIENTIFIC FACT,  DISPROVES THE SEEMINGLY FORMIDABLE WORDS OF ALLAH OF CREATING EVERYTHING IN PAIRS.
And We created pairs of everything that you may contemplate. [51: 49] 

ONE-CELLED ORGANISMS HAVE NO PAIRS. 
IT IS BUT SINGLE CELL ORGANISMS THAT REPRODUCE BY BINARY FISSION OR SIMPLE DIVISION.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_(biology)#Anatomy 
There are two types of cells: eukaryotic and prokaryotic. Prokaryotic cells are usually independent, while eukaryotic cells can either exist as a single celled organism
Prokaryotes
Typical organismsbacteria, archaea








Organizationusually single cells
Cell divisionBinary fission (simple division)
 ARCHAEA AND BACTERIA, THEY ARE WITHOUT PAIRS AS IT SAY 
Prokaryotic cells are usually independent and when reproduction is by binary fission complete independence is an inherent attribute, thus it has no pair but only a sister cell.
Binary fission is the form of asexual reproduction occurring in prokaryotes. Binary fission occurs when the parent organism splits in two, producing two completely independent daughter cells. Genetically, the daughter cells are exactly like the parent cell. Since all prokaryotic organisms are single-celled, cell division and reproduction by binary fission are  same process for them.
http://www.apelslice.com/books/9780618843175NIMAS/HTMLOUT/HTML/c_id4614683.html

is the sister cell a partner or pair?

The Arabic word “azvaj” is the plural of “zavj” meaning “pairs,” “matches,” “partners.” There are three sorts of pairs in the Creation as described in the verse:

a- Pairs that grow from the earth, i.e., plants that have species of differentiated sex.
b- Human pairs, males and females. Also some included human characteristics like bravery / cowardice; love / hate; generosity / stinginess, etc.
c- Pairs unknown: men did not know anything about the creation in pairs at the time of the descent of the Quran. In this section we shall be dealing with the latter in particular

no, bec they are similar, 

Genetically, the daughter cells are exactly like the parent cell.


and if you say, two daughter cells is a pair, but then was the first mother cell during creation had a pair?

none bec as their characteristic proves they are completely independent, OR THEY ENTIRELY LIVE ALONE, THUS HAVING NO PAIR!

Moreover, i found this piece supportive more:
Muslims defended
What about the Hermaphrodite and Parthenogenesis (asexual, sexless) species?
1-  Hermaphrodite species are those that have both the male and female organs and can reproduce by themselves due to those organs:
"The term is sometimes used inaccurately to describe reproduction modes in hermaphroditic species which can reproduce by themselves because they contain reproductive organs of both sexes."  (Source)
Certainly, these species do not contradict at all the Glorious Quran.  On the contrary, they further prove Allah Almighty's Divine Claims, because here we have a group of species that still need to reproduce by having the pairs in them.  Yes, it would be one specie reproducing by itself, assuming that this is scientifically accurate to begin with, since much of these studies are still unconfirmed theories, as shown below, especially in the microscopic world, but be as it may, each specie in this group, nonetheless:
  1. Is still a representation of the pairs.  It could be one or the other or both.  
  2. Wouldn't be able to reproduce if it didn't have those two organs in it.  
  3. Still produces both males and females, as further shown below.
The sex organs must be in pairs but how about the being as an organism, does a hermaphrodite have a pair? 

note: And We created pairs of everything that you may contemplate. [51: 49]

A HERMAPRODITE AND PROKARYOTES HAVE NO PAIRS!
Who lies? Science and reality Or Allah?


lil Susie 
2 comments

ISLAM'S MYTH: MODERN MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION WAS PROPHESIED IN QURAN


MODERN MEANS OF TRANSPORT AS PROPHESIED IN QURAN--> https://www.facebook.com/groups/107901075994273/?fref=ts

And horses, mules, and donkeys both to ride and for adornment. And He creates other things you do not know. (Qur'an, 16:8)

The above verse indicates that in addition to the animals mentioned here, people will have various unknown (to them) means of transport. The following verse points to the fact that there will be such mass modes of transport as ships:

A Sign for them is that We carried their families in the laden ship. And We have created for them the like of it, in which they sail. (Qur'an, 36:41-42)

IS IT CLEARLY SO?



1. Modern transportation: water

Sign for them is that We carried their families in the laden ship. And We have created for them the like of it in which they sail. (Qur'an, 36:41-42)

Logic speaks that that mode of transportation that is 'the likes of the ship' is water transportation Allah spoke about as he said to those who rode the likes of the ship, that if Allah willed he could have drowned them.

(36:43:1)
wa-in
And if

(36:43:2)
nasha
We will,

(36:43:3)
nugh'riq'hum
We could drown them;

(36:43:4)
falā
then not

(36:43:5)
ṣarīkha
(would be) a responder to a cry

(36:43:6)
lahum
for them,

(36:43:7)
walā
and not

(36:43:8)
hum
they

(36:43:9)
yunqadhūna
would be saved,

Sign for them is that We carried their families in the laden ship. And We have created for them the like of it in which they sail. (Qur'an, 36:41-42)

CREATED THE LIKE OF IT?
The word used was created, or wakhalaqnā and it is in the past tense as relative to 'carried their families in the laden ship', meaning it was not simply ship they sailed to, it was other water transportation during those times these specific families sailed along to, thus that assumed miracle is convincingly a miracle on the water transport category but If you insist though on your argument of modern transportation by saying:

And horses, mules, and donkeys both to ride and for adornment. And He creates other things you do not know. (Qur'an, 16:8)
The above verse indicates that in addition to the animals mentioned here, people will have various unknown (to them) means of transport. 

How could it be certain when it can be explained in many other ways? 


In ordinary perspective, these declarations are ambiguous as it implies a general scope and to simplify it into something specific as cars and airplanes etc.. would bend the force of logic amiss.

2. modern transportation
And horses, mules, and donkeys both to ride and for adornment And He creates other things you do not know. (Qur'an, 16:8)

Is the other things he created specific of modern transportation alone? 
or he was simply speaking of everything HE CREATED THAT MUHAMMAD HAS NO KNOWLEDGE ABOUT? 
It could be present things or futuristic things thus to only specify it as transportation is quite ambitious and false in order to elevate Islam's integrity in miles. 

Is it not ambiguous to say I MADE OTHER THINGS bec OTHER THINGS may mean everything Muhammad doesn't know & anything that would be invented in the future would automatically be credited to Allah but to say it is only about transportation is specifying what is not specific. Its credibility as a legitimate specific miracle is muddled by its generality, bec knowledge is that Allah is the only creator of everything, as allah said:  And He creates other things you do not know. (Qur'an, 16:8) 
BY IT, YOU WILL ALSO SAY, ALLAH SPOKE OF CREATING RICE FIELD TRACTORS, THRESHERS, WIND MILLS, MINE PANNER, to say the simpler machineries or even too, MICROSCOPE, X-RAY MACHINES etc... OR CLAIM ANY INVENTION YOU LIKE...

Does Islam say it is about modern land transportation bec of Allah mentioning something about a way, saying, he'll guide you, is that not preferably about your way of life he was talking about?



And He creates


(16:8:7)
mā
what


(16:8:8)
lā
not


(16:8:9)
taʿlamūna
you know.


(16:9:1)
waʿalā
And upon


(16:9:2)
l-lahi
Allah


(16:9:3)
qaṣdu
(is) the direction


(16:9:4)
l-sabīli
(of) the way,


(16:9:5)
wamin'hā
and among them


(16:9:6)
jāirun
(are) crooked.

(16:9:7)
walaw
And if


(16:9:8)
shāa
He willed,


(16:9:9)
lahadākum
surely He would have guided you


(16:9:10)
ajmaʿīna
all



WAS THAT VERSE DETAILED SPECIFICALLY AS MODERN LAND TRANSPORTATION? 

WAS IT NOT TOO SPEAKING OF SATELLITES, TV, COMPUTER ETC...AND ALL OTHER THINGS MUHAMMAD DID NOT KNOW ABOUT?

Alif Lam Ra. A Book whose verses are set clear, and then distinguished, from One All-wise, All-aware: S. 11:1
… Shall I seek a judge other than Allah while it is He Who has sent down unto you the Book (The Qur'an), explained in detail… S. 6:114 Hilali-Khan
… And We have sent down on thee the Book making clear everything, and as a guidance and a mercy, and as good tidings to those who surrender. S. 16:89 Arberry
A Book whereof the Verses are explained in detail; A Qur'an in Arabic for people who know S. 41:3 Hilali-Khan

BY THIS AMBIGUITY, IT FALSIFIED ISLAM IN GREAT DESPICABLE HEIGHTS QURAN IS NOT CLEAR! 
OR Was it only the scholars who are extravagantly misinterpreting?

BUT FROM WHOM IS YOUR MUSLIM FAITH?
On the day when their faces shall be rolled in the fire, they shall cry:...
And they shall say: "Oh our Lord! indeed we obeyed our chiefs and our great ones, and they misled us from the way of God
O our Lord! give them a double chastisement, and curse them with a heavy curse."
(Surih XXXIII, "The Confederates ", vv. 64-8) [33:64-68]

lil Susie
2 comments
 
Support : Creating Website | Johny Template | Mas Template
Copyright © 2011. i.Am.lil.Susie - All Rights Reserved
Template Created by Creating Website Published by Mas Template
Proudly powered by Blogger